Renault Megane 2006 vs Renault Scenic 2006
| Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 135 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 191 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Renault Megane is more dynamic to drive. Renault Megane engine produces 30 HP more power than Renault Scenic, whereas torque is 79 NM more than Renault Scenic. Thanks to more power Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Megane is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Megane consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that by driving the Renault Megane over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Megane consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Renault Grand Espace | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Megane, Renault Espace | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Megane might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Megane 2006 2.0 engine: This engine offers a respectable lifespan for a turbocharged motor but comes with several recurring issues that demand attention. One common problem is oil consumption, which can result from hardened valve seals or, in later ... More about Renault Megane 2006 2.0 engine Renault Scenic 2006 2.0 engine: The F4R 2.0 engine is a relatively simple and reliable unit, capable of lasting up to 400,000 km with proper maintenance. Its design is straightforward, and service is generally accessible. However, several recurring issues ... More about Renault Scenic 2006 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Renault Megane is smaller. Renault Megane is 5 cm shorter than the Renault Scenic, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Megane is 16 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 406 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1190 litres | 1840 litres | |
|
Renault Scenic has more luggage space. Renault Megane has 76 litres less trunk space than the Renault Scenic. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Scenic (by 650 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.2 metres less than that of the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`955 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Renault Scenic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Renault Scenic, so Renault Scenic quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 6.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |