Renault Megane 2006 vs Renault Scenic 2006
| Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 135 HP | 135 HP | |
| Torque: | 191 NM | 191 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
| Renault Megane and Renault Scenic have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 8.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.8 l/100km | 9.7 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Megane is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Megane consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that by driving the Renault Megane over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Megane consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 370'000 km | 370'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 11 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Renault Megane is smaller. Renault Megane is 5 cm shorter than the Renault Scenic, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Megane is 16 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 406 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1190 litres | 1840 litres | |
|
Renault Scenic has more luggage space. Renault Megane has 76 litres less trunk space than the Renault Scenic. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Scenic (by 650 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.2 metres less than that of the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`805 | 1`985 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Renault Scenic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Renault Scenic, so Renault Scenic quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 6.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |