Renault Megane 2006 vs Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Renault Megane engine produces 45 HP less power than Chrysler PT Cruiser, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Chrysler PT Cruiser. Despite less power, Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Megane is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Megane consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler PT Cruiser, which means that by driving the Renault Megane over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Megane consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler PT Cruiser. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1270 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.60 m | |
| Renault Megane is 8 cm shorter than the Chrysler PT Cruiser, 8 cm wider, while the height of Renault Megane is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 538 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1190 litres | no data | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser has more luggage space. Renault Megane has 208 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler PT Cruiser. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.6 metres less than that of the Chrysler PT Cruiser, which means Renault Megane can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`770 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Renault Megane has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chrysler PT Cruiser has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Renault Megane, so Renault Megane quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
| |