Renault Megane 2008 vs Mazda 3 2010

 
Renault Megane
2008 - 2012
Mazda 3
2010 - 2011
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.5 Diesel1.6 Diesel

Performance

Power: 110 HP115 HP
Torque: 240 NM270 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10 seconds11 seconds
Renault Megane engine produces 5 HP less power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Mazda 3. Despite less power, Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.64.4
Renault Megane consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Megane could require 30 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1300 km in combined cycle1240 km in combined cycle
1530 km on highway1410 km on highway
Ground clearance: 120 mm (4.7 inches)155 mm (6.1 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 3 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 3 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions.

Dimensions

Length: 4.30 m4.46 m
Width: 1.81 m1.76 m
Height: 1.47 m1.47 m
Renault Megane is 16 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 6 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 372 litres340 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1162 litres1360 litres
Even though the car is shorter, Renault Megane has 32 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The Mazda 3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 (by 198 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Renault Megane can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7971`830
Safety:
Quality:
below average

high
Mazda 3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 34004200
Pros and Cons: Renault Megane has
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Mazda 3 has
  • higher ground clearance
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv