Renault Megane 2008 vs Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser is a more dynamic driving. Renault Megane engine produces 60 HP less power than Chrysler PT Cruiser, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Chrysler PT Cruiser. Due to the lower power, Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Megane is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Megane consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler PT Cruiser, which means that by driving the Renault Megane over 15,000 km in a year you can save 330 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Megane consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler PT Cruiser. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1330 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 1110 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Renault Megane 2008 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Megane 2008 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Renault Megane is larger, but lower. Renault Megane is 1 cm longer than the Chrysler PT Cruiser, 11 cm wider, while the height of Renault Megane is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 372 litres | 538 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1162 litres | no data | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Renault Megane has 166 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler PT Cruiser. This could mean that the Renault Megane uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.1 metres less than that of the Chrysler PT Cruiser. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`762 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Renault Megane has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chrysler PT Cruiser has serious deffects in 230 percent more cases than Renault Megane, so Renault Megane quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
| |