Renault Megane 2008 vs Volvo C30 2006

 
Renault Megane
2008 - 2012
Volvo C30
2006 - 2009
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.5 Diesel1.6 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain and belt

Performance

Power: 90 HP109 HP
Torque: 200 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12 seconds11.9 seconds
Renault Megane engine produces 19 HP less power than Volvo C30, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Volvo C30. Due to the lower power, Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.54.9
Real fuel consumption: 5.4 l/100km5.7 l/100km
The Renault Megane is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Renault Megane consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C30, which means that by driving the Renault Megane over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Megane consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C30.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1330 km in combined cycle1120 km in combined cycle
1500 km on highway1300 km on highway
1110 km with real consumption960 km with real consumption
Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Engine production duration: 8 years5 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan JukeInstalled on at least 3 other car models, including Volvo S80, Volvo S40, Volvo V50
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Megane might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Volvo C30 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.
Renault Megane 2008 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ...  More about Renault Megane 2008 1.5 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.30 m4.25 m
Width: 1.81 m1.78 m
Height: 1.47 m1.45 m
Both cars are similar in size. Renault Megane is 5 cm longer than the Volvo C30, 3 cm wider, while the height of Renault Megane is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 372 litres251 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1162 litresno data
Renault Megane has more luggage capacity.
Renault Megane has 121 litres more trunk space than the Volvo C30.
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volvo C30, which means Renault Megane can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Power steering: Electric power steeringHydraulic power steering
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7621`780
Safety:
Quality:
low

below average
Volvo C30 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Volvo C30, so Volvo C30 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 24003000
Rating in user reviews: 8.0/10 8.4/10
Pros and Cons: Renault Megane has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • electric power steering
  • lower price
Volvo C30 has
  • more power
  • hydraulic power steering
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv