Renault Megane 2010 vs Seat Leon 2009
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 106 HP | 102 HP | |
Torque: | n/a NM | 148 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.9 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
Renault Megane engine produces 4 HP more power than Seat Leon. Despite the higher power, Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.6 | |
Renault Megane consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Leon, which means that by driving the Renault Megane over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
1030 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.30 m | 4.32 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | no data | 1.46 m | |
Trunk capacity: | 368 litres | 341 litres | |
Renault Megane has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Renault Megane has 27 litres more trunk space than the Seat Leon. The Seat Leon may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.4 metres more than that of the Seat Leon, which means Renault Megane can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`755 | 1`783 | |
Safety: | |||
Seat Leon scores higher in safety tests. | |||
Quality: | low | above average | |
Seat Leon has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Seat Leon, so Seat Leon quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 4000 | 4400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Seat Leon has
| |