Renault Megane 2010 vs Fiat Bravo 2010
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 106 HP | 120 HP | |
Torque: | n/a NM | 300 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.9 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
Fiat Bravo is a more dynamic driving. Renault Megane engine produces 14 HP less power than Fiat Bravo. Due to the lower power, Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 4.6 | |
The Fiat Bravo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Megane consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Bravo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Megane could require 435 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 1260 km in combined cycle | |
1030 km on highway | 1520 km on highway | ||
Fiat Bravo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.30 m | 4.34 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | no data | 1.50 m | |
Trunk capacity: | 368 litres | 400 litres | |
Fiat Bravo has more luggage space. Renault Megane has 32 litres less trunk space than the Fiat Bravo. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.7 metres more than that of the Fiat Bravo, which means Renault Megane can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`755 | 1`830 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | low | |
Renault Megane has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Bravo has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Renault Megane, so Renault Megane quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 3800 | 4600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Fiat Bravo has
| |