Renault Megane 2020 vs Seat Ateca 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Renault Megane is available only with front wheel drive, while Seat Ateca can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 1.0 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Renault Megane is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 92 - 160 HP | 115 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 144 - 270 NM | 200 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 - 11.4 seconds | 8.3 - 11 seconds | |
| In general, Seat Ateca are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Renault Megane. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 1.6 - 7.1 | 4.3 - 5.5 | |
|
Renault Megane petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Seat Ateca. On average, Renault Megane equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ateca. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Renault Megane is larger, but lower. Renault Megane is 29 cm longer than the Seat Ateca, 6 cm wider, while the height of Renault Megane is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 521 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1504 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.6 metres more than that of the Seat Ateca, which means Renault Megane can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`933 kg | ~ 1`937 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`292 kg | ~ 1`321 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 641 kg | ~ 616 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 15 400 | 14 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Seat Ateca has
| |