Renault Megane 2016 vs Peugeot 2008 2013

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Renault Megane
2016 - 2020
Peugeot 2008
2013 - 2016
Body: HatchbackCrossover / SUV
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.2 - 1.81.2 - 1.6

Performance

Power: 90 - 300 HP82 - 120 HP
Torque: 165 - 400 NM118 - 230 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 5.7 - 13.4 seconds9.5 - 15.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.7 - 8.13.8 - 6.5
Renault Megane petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Peugeot 2008. On average, a Renault Megane with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Peugeot 2008.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Ground clearance: 145 mm (5.7 inches)165 mm (6.5 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Peugeot 2008 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 4.36 m4.16 m
Width: 1.81 m1.75 m
Height: 1.45 m1.56 m
Renault Megane is larger, but lower.
Renault Megane is 20 cm longer than the Peugeot 2008, 6 cm wider, while the height of Renault Megane is 11 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 407 litres360 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1247 litres1194 litres
Renault Megane has more luggage capacity.
Renault Megane has 47 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 2008. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Megane (by 53 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.6 metres more than that of the Peugeot 2008, which means Renault Megane can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`865~ 1`653
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 14 4008000
Pros and Cons: Renault Megane has
  • roomier boot
Peugeot 2008 has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • higher ground clearance
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv