Renault Megane 2012 vs Ford Focus 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 220 HP | 105 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 - 380 NM | 150 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 - 12.5 seconds | 8.9 - 12.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.4 - 7.7 | 5.0 - 6.4 | |
|
Renault Megane petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Focus. On average, Renault Megane equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Megane is 6 cm shorter than the Ford Focus, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 277 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1162 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Megane has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Renault Megane has 128 litres more trunk space than the Ford Focus. The Ford Focus may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`814 | ~ 1`938 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Ford Focus has
| |