Renault Megane 2012 vs Renault Clio 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Renault Megane is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Renault Clio is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 1.2 - 2.0 | 1.1 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 220 HP | 75 - 197 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 - 380 NM | 105 - 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 - 12.5 seconds | 6.9 - 13.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.4 - 7.7 | 4.7 - 8.9 | |
|
Renault Megane petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Clio. On average, Renault Megane equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Renault Megane is larger, but slightly lower. Renault Megane is 28 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 9 cm wider, while the height of Renault Megane is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 288 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1162 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Megane has more luggage capacity. Renault Megane has 117 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`814 | ~ 1`623 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Renault Clio has
| |