Renault Megane 2012 vs Renault Clio 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 2.0 | 0.9 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 220 HP | 90 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 - 380 NM | 135 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 - 12.5 seconds | 6.7 - 12.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.4 - 7.7 | 3.2 - 6.3 | |
|
Renault Megane petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Clio. On average, Renault Megane equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.07 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Renault Megane is larger. Renault Megane is 23 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 8 cm wider, while the height of Renault Megane is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1162 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Megane has more luggage capacity. Renault Megane has 105 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.4 metres more than that of the Renault Clio, which means Renault Megane can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`814 | ~ 1`653 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Renault Clio has
| |