Renault Megane 2000 vs Volkswagen Polo 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Cabrio | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 (petrol) | 1.2 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
Both cars are available with petrol engines. Volkswagen Polo is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 95 - 140 HP | 60 - 180 HP | |
Torque: | 127 - 200 NM | 108 - 250 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 - 12.5 seconds | 6.9 - 16.1 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 - 7.6 | 3.3 - 5.9 | |
Renault Megane petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Polo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.08 m | 3.97 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
Height: | 1.37 m | 1.48 m | |
Renault Megane is larger, but lower. Renault Megane is 11 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 2 cm wider, while the height of Renault Megane is 11 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 281 litres | 280 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 952 litres | |
Renault Megane has 1 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`578 | ~ 1`597 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | average | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 4000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |