Renault Megane 2000 vs Mercedes SLK 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Renault Megane is available with front wheel drive, while Mercedes SLK can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 2.0 - 3.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 - 140 HP | 163 - 354 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 - 200 NM | 230 - 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 - 12.5 seconds | 5.2 - 8.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 - 7.6 | 9.2 - 11.2 | |
|
Renault Megane petrol engines consumes on average 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes SLK. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.08 m | 4.01 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.27 m | |
| Renault Megane is 7 cm longer than the Mercedes SLK, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Megane is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 281 litres | 145 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 348 litres | |
|
Renault Megane has more luggage capacity. Renault Megane has 136 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes SLK. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mercedes SLK. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`578 | ~ 1`661 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Mercedes SLK has
| |