Renault Megane 2003 vs Mazda CX-5 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Cabrio | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Renault Megane is available only with front wheel drive, while Mazda CX-5 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 163 HP | 150 - 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 152 - 300 NM | 210 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 - 13.6 seconds | 7.9 - 10.2 seconds | |
| In general, Mazda CX-5 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Renault Megane. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 8.4 | 4.6 - 7.3 | |
|
Renault Megane petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda CX-5. On average, a Renault Megane with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Mazda CX-5. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Renault Megane is smaller. Renault Megane is 18 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Megane is 29 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 190 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
490 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage space. Renault Megane has 315 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 1130 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 1 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Renault Megane can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`845 kg | ~ 2`045 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`393 kg | ~ 1`473 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 452 kg | ~ 572 kg | |
| Renault Megane load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 27 procentiem less than Mazda CX-5. Therefore, Mazda CX-5 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |