Renault Megane 2006 vs Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 2.4 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 - 165 HP | 143 - 223 HP | |
| Torque: | 151 - 340 NM | 220 - 332 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 - 13.6 seconds | 7.6 - 12.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 8.4 | 9.4 - 10.4 | |
|
Renault Megane petrol engines consumes on average 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chrysler PT Cruiser. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Renault Megane is larger, but lower. Renault Megane is 7 cm longer than the Chrysler PT Cruiser, 3 cm wider, while the height of Renault Megane is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 190 litres | 210 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
490 litres | no data | |
| Despite its longer length, Renault Megane has 20 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler PT Cruiser. This could mean that the Renault Megane uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 1.1 metres less than that of the Chrysler PT Cruiser, which means Renault Megane can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`854 | ~ 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
| |