Renault Megane 2006 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Renault Megane is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Mitsubishi Colt is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 1.5 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 - 165 HP | 109 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 151 - 340 NM | 145 - 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 - 13.6 seconds | 8.4 - 10.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 8.4 | 6.6 - 7.1 | |
|
Renault Megane petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Colt. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 3.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Renault Megane is larger, but lower. Renault Megane is 48 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt, 9 cm wider, while the height of Renault Megane is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 190 litres | 190 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
490 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`854 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 3000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |