Renault Megane 2010 vs Ford Focus 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Cabrio | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 110 - 180 HP | 80 - 305 HP | |
Torque: | 151 - 300 NM | 124 - 440 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 - 13.2 seconds | 5.9 - 14.1 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 - 8.1 | 4.5 - 9.4 | |
On average, the Renault Megane petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Ford Focus. On average, Renault Megane equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.49 m | 4.35 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.50 m | |
Renault Megane is 14 cm longer than the Ford Focus, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Megane is 6 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 211 litres | 396 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1247 litres | |
Ford Focus has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Renault Megane has 185 litres less trunk space than the Ford Focus. This could mean that the Renault Megane uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 12.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 1.3 metres less than that of the Ford Focus, which means Renault Megane can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`887 | ~ 1`805 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | average | |
Average price (€): | 8600 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Ford Focus has
| |