Renault Megane 2010 vs Volvo C70 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 - 180 HP | 136 - 220 HP | |
| Torque: | 151 - 300 NM | 220 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 - 13.2 seconds | 7.6 - 11.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 - 8.1 | 5.9 - 9.6 | |
|
Renault Megane petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo C70. On average, Renault Megane equipped with diesel engines consume 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C70. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Renault Megane is smaller, but slightly higher. Renault Megane is 13 cm shorter than the Volvo C70, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Megane is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 211 litres | 404 litres | |
|
Volvo C70 has more luggage space. Renault Megane has 193 litres less trunk space than the Volvo C70. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 1.1 metres less than that of the Volvo C70, which means Renault Megane can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`887 | ~ 2`108 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Volvo C70 has
| |