Renault Megane 1999 vs Ford Puma 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Renault Megane is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Ford Puma is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 1.4 - 1.7 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 - 147 HP | 90 - 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 - 200 NM | 122 - 157 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 - 11.9 seconds | 9.2 - 11.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 7.6 | 7.2 - 7.4 | |
|
Renault Megane petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Puma. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.97 m | 3.98 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.34 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Megane is 1 cm shorter than the Ford Puma, 3 cm wider, while the height of Renault Megane is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 288 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 1.3 metres more than that of the Ford Puma, which means Renault Megane can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`543 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Ford Puma has
| |