Renault Megane 1999 vs Citroen Xsara 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 - 147 HP | 71 - 167 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 - 200 NM | 120 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 - 11.9 seconds | 8 - 15.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 7.6 | 5.2 - 9.3 | |
|
Renault Megane petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Citroen Xsara. On average, Renault Megane equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.97 m | 4.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.40 m | |
| Renault Megane is 22 cm shorter than the Citroen Xsara, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Megane is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 288 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.6 metres more than that of the Citroen Xsara, which means Renault Megane can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`543 | ~ 1`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Citroen Xsara has
| |