Renault Megane 2012 vs Volvo C30 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.2 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 256 HP | 100 - 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 151 - 380 NM | 150 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6 - 12.5 seconds | 6.7 - 11.9 seconds | |
| In general, Volvo C30 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Renault Megane. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.5 - 8.2 | 4.9 - 9.4 | |
|
Renault Megane petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo C30. On average, Renault Megane equipped with diesel engines consume 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C30. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Megane is 5 cm longer than the Volvo C30, 2 cm wider, while the height of Renault Megane is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1024 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Megane has more luggage capacity. Renault Megane has 126 litres more trunk space than the Volvo C30. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.35 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.75 metres more than that of the Volvo C30, which means Renault Megane can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`814 kg | ~ 1`816 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`259 kg | ~ 1`396 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 555 kg | ~ 420 kg | |
| Renault Megane load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 24 procentiem more than Volvo C30. Therefore, Renault Megane is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Volvo C30 has
| |