Renault Megane 2012 vs Mazda 3 2013

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Renault Megane
2012 - 2016
Mazda 3
2013 - 2016
Body: CoupeHatchback
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.2 - 2.01.5 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 90 - 256 HP100 - 187 HP
Torque: 151 - 380 NM144 - 380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6 - 12.5 seconds8.1 - 13.6 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.5 - 8.24.1 - 7.6
Renault Megane petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. On average, Renault Megane equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Ground clearance: 120 mm (4.7 inches)155 mm (6.1 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 3 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 4.30 m4.47 m
Width: 1.80 m1.79 m
Height: 1.43 m1.45 m
Renault Megane is 17 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 2 cm wider, while the height of Renault Megane is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 377 litres364 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1024 litres1263 litres
Even though the car is shorter, Renault Megane has 13 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The Mazda 3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 (by 239 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.35 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.75 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Renault Megane can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`814~ 1`864
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

above average
Average price (€): 72007000
Pros and Cons:
    Mazda 3 has
    • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
    • higher ground clearance
    • better manoeuvrability
    • fewer faults
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv