Renault Megane 2012 vs Mazda 3 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Coupe | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Engines: | 1.2 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 - 256 HP | 105 - 260 HP | |
Torque: | 151 - 380 NM | 145 - 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6 - 12.5 seconds | 6.1 - 13.1 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.5 - 8.2 | 4.3 - 9.6 | |
Renault Megane petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. On average, Renault Megane equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Ground clearance: | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 119 - 155 mm (4.7 - 6.1 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.30 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.47 m | |
Renault Megane is 18 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 5 cm wider, while the height of Renault Megane is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 481 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1024 litres | 1360 litres | |
Mazda 3 has more luggage space. Renault Megane has 104 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 (by 336 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.35 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.35 metres more than that of the Mazda 3. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`814 | ~ 1`864 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | high | |
Average price (€): | 7200 | 4800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |