Renault Megane 2012 vs Mazda 3 2011

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Renault Megane
2012 - 2016
Mazda 3
2011 - 2013
Body: CoupeHatchback
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.2 - 2.01.6 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 90 - 256 HP105 - 260 HP
Torque: 151 - 380 NM145 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6 - 12.5 seconds6.1 - 13.1 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.5 - 8.24.3 - 9.6
Renault Megane petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. On average, Renault Megane equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Ground clearance: 120 mm (4.7 inches)119 - 155 mm (4.7 - 6.1 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 4.30 m4.48 m
Width: 1.80 m1.76 m
Height: 1.43 m1.47 m
Renault Megane is 18 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 5 cm wider, while the height of Renault Megane is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 377 litres481 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1024 litres1360 litres
Mazda 3 has more luggage space.
Renault Megane has 104 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 (by 336 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.35 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.35 metres more than that of the Mazda 3.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`814~ 1`864
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

high
Average price (€): 72004800
Pros and Cons: Renault Megane has
  • lower fuel consumption
Mazda 3 has
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv