Renault Megane 1999 vs Citroen Xantia 1993
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.9 | 1.6 - 2.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 65 - 115 HP | 71 - 194 HP | |
| Torque: | 114 - 200 NM | 121 - 267 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 - 18.7 seconds | 8.2 - 23.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 7.7 | 6.2 - 11.6 | |
|
Renault Megane petrol engines consumes on average 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Citroen Xantia. On average, Renault Megane equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xantia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.38 m | |
| Renault Megane and Citroen Xantia are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1310 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.1 metres less than that of the Citroen Xantia. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`641 | ~ 1`253 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Citroen Xantia has
| |