Renault Megane 2003 vs Mazda 3 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 - 136 HP | 105 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 - 300 NM | 145 - 245 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 - 14.7 seconds | 9 - 12.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 8.4 | 5.0 - 8.2 | |
|
Renault Megane petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. On average, Renault Megane equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Megane is 1 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 413 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 675 litres | |
|
Renault Megane has more luggage capacity. Renault Megane has 107 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 3. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`801 | ~ 1`718 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |