Renault Megane 2003 vs Hyundai Elantra 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 80 - 136 HP | 105 - 143 HP | |
Torque: | 127 - 300 NM | 143 - 235 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 - 14.7 seconds | 9 - 13 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 8.4 | 6.4 - 8.8 | |
Renault Megane petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Hyundai Elantra. On average, Renault Megane equipped with diesel engines consume 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Elantra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.50 m | 4.52 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.72 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.42 m | |
Renault Megane is 2 cm shorter than the Hyundai Elantra, 6 cm wider, while the height of Renault Megane is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 415 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1222 litres | |
Renault Megane has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Renault Megane has 105 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Elantra. The Hyundai Elantra may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.6 metres more than that of the Hyundai Elantra, which means Renault Megane can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`801 | ~ 1`790 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Hyundai Elantra has
| |