Renault Megane 1999 vs Volkswagen Polo 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.4 - 1.9 | 1.4 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 65 - 115 HP | 60 - 100 HP | |
Torque: | 114 - 200 NM | 116 - 145 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 18.1 seconds | 11.1 - 17.3 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 - 7.7 | 5.2 - 8.6 | |
Renault Megane petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Polo. On average, Renault Megane equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.44 m | 4.14 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.64 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.46 m | |
Renault Megane is larger, but slightly lower. Renault Megane is 30 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 6 cm wider, while the height of Renault Megane is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 485 litres | 390 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1600 litres | 1250 litres | |
Renault Megane has more luggage capacity. Renault Megane has 95 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Megane (by 350 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Renault Megane can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`724 | ~ 1`545 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |