Renault Megane 2006 vs Volvo V60 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Renault Megane is available only with front wheel drive, while Volvo V60 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.5 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 - 150 HP | 115 - 367 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 - 340 NM | 220 - 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 13.2 seconds | 4.8 - 12.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 - 8.4 | 3.8 - 10.2 | |
|
On average, the Renault Megane petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Volvo V60. On average, Renault Megane equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 136 mm (5.4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo V60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Renault Megane is smaller. Renault Megane is 13 cm shorter than the Volvo V60, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Megane is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1600 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Megane has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Renault Megane has 90 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V60. The Volvo V60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 13.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 2.6 metres less than that of the Volvo V60, which means Renault Megane can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`854 | ~ 2`168 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 13 400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 9.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Volvo V60 has
| |