Renault Megane 2006 vs Volvo V50 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Renault Megane is available only with front wheel drive, while Volvo V50 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 85 - 150 HP | 100 - 220 HP | |
Torque: | 127 - 340 NM | 150 - 350 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 13.2 seconds | 6.9 - 12.1 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 - 8.4 | 5.0 - 10.2 | |
Renault Megane petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo V50. On average, Renault Megane equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.50 m | 4.51 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.45 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Renault Megane is 1 cm shorter than the Volvo V50, 1 cm wider, while the height of Renault Megane is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 417 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1600 litres | 1307 litres | |
Renault Megane has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Renault Megane has 103 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V50. The Volvo V50 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Megane (by 293 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volvo V50, which means Renault Megane can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`854 | ~ 1`856 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | above average | |
Average price (€): | 1400 | 2000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 6.4/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Volvo V50 has
| |