Renault Megane 2009 vs Renault Laguna 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.5 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 180 HP | 110 - 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 - 380 NM | 195 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 - 12.9 seconds | 8.7 - 12.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 7.6 | 5.2 - 8.7 | |
|
Renault Megane petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Laguna. On average, Renault Megane equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Renault Megane is smaller, but slightly higher. Renault Megane is 24 cm shorter than the Renault Laguna, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Megane is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 524 litres | 508 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1595 litres | no data | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Renault Megane has 16 litres more trunk space than the Renault Laguna. The Renault Laguna may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.1 metres more than that of the Renault Laguna. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`842 | ~ 2`021 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Renault Laguna has
| |