Renault Megane 2009 vs Volvo V50 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Renault Megane is available only with front wheel drive, while Volvo V50 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 180 HP | 100 - 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 - 380 NM | 150 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 - 12.9 seconds | 6.9 - 12.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 7.6 | 5.0 - 10.1 | |
|
Renault Megane petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo V50. On average, Renault Megane equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Megane is 4 cm longer than the Volvo V50, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 524 litres | 417 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1595 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Megane has more luggage capacity. Renault Megane has 107 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V50. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`842 | ~ 1`943 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Volvo V50 has
| |