Renault Megane 1999 vs Renault Scenic 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.9 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 65 - 115 HP | 80 - 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 114 - 200 NM | 127 - 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 - 17.9 seconds | 10.2 - 15.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 7.7 | 5.7 - 8.5 | |
|
Renault Megane petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Scenic. On average, a Renault Megane with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Renault Scenic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 4.17 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.68 m | |
| Renault Megane is 1 cm shorter than the Renault Scenic, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Megane is 26 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 348 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1210 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.6 metres more than that of the Renault Scenic, which means Renault Megane can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`630 | ~ 1`306 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |