Renault Megane 2002 vs Ford Fiesta 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.2 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 80 - 225 HP | 68 - 150 HP | |
Torque: | 127 - 300 NM | 106 - 204 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 - 14.7 seconds | 8.4 - 15.8 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 8.8 | 4.3 - 7.5 | |
Renault Megane petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Fiesta. On average, Renault Megane equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fiesta. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.21 m | 3.92 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.68 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
Renault Megane is larger, but slightly lower. Renault Megane is 29 cm longer than the Ford Fiesta, 10 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 268 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1190 litres | 945 litres | |
Renault Megane has more luggage capacity. Renault Megane has 62 litres more trunk space than the Ford Fiesta. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Megane (by 245 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 9.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.7 metres more than that of the Ford Fiesta, which means Renault Megane can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`778 | ~ 1`538 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Ford Fiesta has
| |