Renault Megane 2002 vs Citroen C4 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Hatchback | Coupe | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 80 - 225 HP | 90 - 180 HP | |
Torque: | 127 - 300 NM | 133 - 340 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 - 14.7 seconds | 8.9 - 14.2 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 8.8 | 4.5 - 8.4 | |
Renault Megane petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Citroen C4. On average, a Renault Megane with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Citroen C4. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.21 m | 4.27 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Renault Megane is 6 cm shorter than the Citroen C4, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 314 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1190 litres | no data | |
Even though the car is shorter, Renault Megane has 16 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C4. The Citroen C4 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 12 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 1.5 metres less than that of the Citroen C4, which means Renault Megane can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`778 | ~ 1`756 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | low | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
| |