Renault Megane 2006 vs Renault Scenic 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 - 225 HP | 85 - 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 - 360 NM | 127 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 - 12.8 seconds | 8.6 - 14.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 8.8 | 5.1 - 8.6 | |
|
Renault Megane petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Scenic. On average, Renault Megane equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Renault Megane is smaller. Renault Megane is 5 cm shorter than the Renault Scenic, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Megane is 16 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 406 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1190 litres | 1840 litres | |
|
Renault Scenic has more luggage space. Renault Megane has 76 litres less trunk space than the Renault Scenic. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Scenic (by 650 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.2 metres more than that of the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`797 | ~ 1`959 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 6.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |