Renault Megane 2010 vs Seat Leon 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 | 1.2 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 106 - 138 HP | 85 - 265 HP | |
| Torque: | 151 - 240 NM | 130 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 - 13.9 seconds | 6.2 - 13.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 7.8 | 4.5 - 8.1 | |
|
Renault Megane petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Seat Leon. On average, Renault Megane equipped with diesel engines consume 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Leon. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.46 m | |
| Renault Megane is 2 cm shorter than the Seat Leon, 4 cm wider, while the height of Renault Megane is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 341 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1162 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Megane has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Renault Megane has 64 litres more trunk space than the Seat Leon. The Seat Leon may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.2 metres more than that of the Seat Leon. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`775 | ~ 1`850 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Seat Leon scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Seat Leon has
| |