Renault Megane 2010 vs Kia Ceed 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 106 - 138 HP | 90 - 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 151 - 240 NM | 137 - 304 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 - 13.9 seconds | 10.3 - 14.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 7.8 | 4.4 - 7.6 | |
|
Renault Megane petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia Ceed. On average, Renault Megane equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Megane is 4 cm longer than the Kia Ceed, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 340 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1162 litres | 1300 litres | |
| Renault Megane has 65 litres more trunk space than the Kia Ceed. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Ceed (by 138 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.8 metres more than that of the Kia Ceed, which means Renault Megane can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`775 | ~ 1`772 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |