Renault Megane 2010 vs Fiat Bravo 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 106 - 138 HP | 90 - 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 151 - 240 NM | 128 - 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 - 13.9 seconds | 8.2 - 13.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 7.8 | 4.4 - 6.6 | |
|
Renault Megane petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Fiat Bravo. On average, Renault Megane equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Bravo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.50 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Megane is 4 cm shorter than the Fiat Bravo, 2 cm wider, while the height of Renault Megane is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 4000 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1162 litres | no data | |
|
Fiat Bravo has more luggage space. Renault Megane has 3595 litres less trunk space than the Fiat Bravo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.7 metres more than that of the Fiat Bravo, which means Renault Megane can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`775 | ~ 1`801 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Fiat Bravo has
| |