Renault Laguna 2008 vs Audi A5 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Renault Laguna) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Audi A5) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Audi A5 is a more dynamic driving. Renault Laguna engine produces 20 HP less power than Audi A5, but torque is 90 NM more than Audi A5. Due to the lower power, Renault Laguna reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Laguna is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Laguna consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A5, which means that by driving the Renault Laguna over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Laguna consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1290 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| 980 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Laguna gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Laguna 2008 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.37 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Laguna is 2 cm longer than the Audi A5, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Laguna is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 423 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 829 litres | |
|
Audi A5 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Renault Laguna uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Laguna is 0.4 metres less than that of the Audi A5, which means Renault Laguna can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`972 kg | 1`895 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Audi A5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Laguna has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Audi A5, so Audi A5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 7000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.7/10 | 9.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Laguna has
|
Audi A5 has
| |