Renault Laguna 2008 vs Audi A5 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 211 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 6.9 seconds | |
|
Audi A5 is a more dynamic driving. Renault Laguna engine produces 41 HP less power than Audi A5, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Audi A5. Due to the lower power, Renault Laguna reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.9 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Renault Laguna consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Laguna could require 255 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Renault Laguna consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Renault Grand Espace | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Audi A4, Audi Q5 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Laguna might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Laguna 2008 2.0 engine: This engine offers a respectable lifespan for a turbocharged motor but comes with several recurring issues that demand attention. One common problem is oil consumption, which can result from hardened valve seals or, in later ... More about Renault Laguna 2008 2.0 engine Audi A5 2008 2.0 engine: This engine offers a good balance of power and fuel efficiency but is highly demanding in terms of service quality. One of its most notable issues is excessive oil consumption. While the manufacturer addressed this ... More about Audi A5 2008 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.37 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Laguna is 2 cm longer than the Audi A5, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Laguna is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 423 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 829 litres | |
|
Audi A5 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Renault Laguna has 32 litres less trunk space than the Audi A5. This could mean that the Renault Laguna uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Laguna is 0.4 metres less than that of the Audi A5, which means Renault Laguna can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`950 | 1`965 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Audi A5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Laguna has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Audi A5, so Audi A5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 7400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.7/10 | 9.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Laguna has
|
Audi A5 has
| |