Renault Laguna 2012 vs Toyota Celica 1999
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 205 HP | 143 HP | |
Torque: | 300 NM | 172 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
Renault Laguna is more dynamic to drive. Renault Laguna engine produces 62 HP more power than Toyota Celica, whereas torque is 128 NM more than Toyota Celica. Thanks to more power Renault Laguna reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 7.7 | |
Renault Laguna consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Laguna could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
1010 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
Renault Laguna gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 15 years | 12 years | |
Engine spread: | Used also on Renault Megane | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota RAV4, Toyota Corolla Verso | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Renault Laguna engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Toyota Celica 1999 1.8 engine: The 1ZZ-FE engine is more advanced, lighter, and simpler than its predecessor, emphasizing fuel efficiency and output. However, these improvements have come at the cost of reduced durability compared to earlier cast-iron engines. The engine block features an open-deck cooling design for easier production and lower ... More about Toyota Celica 1999 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.64 m | 4.34 m | |
Width: | 1.83 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.32 m | |
Renault Laguna is larger. Renault Laguna is 30 cm longer than the Toyota Celica, 9 cm wider, while the height of Renault Laguna is 8 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 423 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Laguna is 0.3 metres less than that of the Toyota Celica. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`923 | 1`200 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 6000 | 2000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Laguna has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |