Renault Laguna 2012 vs Jaguar F-Type 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 5.7 seconds | |
|
Jaguar F-Type is a more dynamic driving. Renault Laguna engine produces 130 HP less power than Jaguar F-Type, whereas torque is 130 NM less than Jaguar F-Type. Due to the lower power, Renault Laguna reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 8.1 | |
|
The Jaguar F-Type is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Laguna consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar F-Type, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Laguna could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Renault Laguna) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar F-Type) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Renault Grand Espace | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Jaguar XE, Jaguar E-Pace | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Laguna might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Laguna 2012 2.0 engine: This engine offers a respectable lifespan for a turbocharged motor but comes with several recurring issues that demand attention. One common problem is oil consumption, which can result from hardened valve seals or, in later ... More about Renault Laguna 2012 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.31 m | |
| Renault Laguna is 17 cm longer than the Jaguar F-Type, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Laguna is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 423 litres | 336 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 509 litres | |
|
Renault Laguna has more luggage capacity. Renault Laguna has 87 litres more trunk space than the Jaguar F-Type. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Laguna is 0.2 metres less than that of the Jaguar F-Type. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`950 | 1`925 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Laguna has
|
Jaguar F-Type has
| |