Renault Laguna 2012 vs Dacia Logan 2016
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Renault Laguna is more dynamic to drive. Renault Laguna engine produces 80 HP more power than Dacia Logan, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Dacia Logan. Thanks to more power Renault Laguna reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 3.6 | |
|
The Dacia Logan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Laguna consumes 5.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Logan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Laguna could require 765 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 1380 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1420 km on highway | ||
| Dacia Logan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Renault Grand Espace | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Logan might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Renault Laguna engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Laguna 2012 2.0 engine: This engine offers a respectable lifespan for a turbocharged motor but comes with several recurring issues that demand attention. One common problem is oil consumption, which can result from hardened valve seals or, in later ... More about Renault Laguna 2012 2.0 engine Dacia Logan 2016 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Dacia Logan 2016 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.35 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Renault Laguna is larger, but lower. Renault Laguna is 30 cm longer than the Dacia Logan, 10 cm wider, while the height of Renault Laguna is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 423 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1250 litres | |
|
Dacia Logan has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Renault Laguna has 87 litres less trunk space than the Dacia Logan. This could mean that the Renault Laguna uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`950 | 1`590 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Laguna has
|
Dacia Logan has
| |