Renault Laguna 2012 vs Chevrolet Camaro 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 323 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 278 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Renault Laguna engine produces 153 HP less power than Chevrolet Camaro, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | no data | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Renault Laguna) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Chevrolet Camaro) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Renault Laguna 2012 2.0 engine: This engine offers a respectable lifespan for a turbocharged motor but comes with several recurring issues that demand attention. One common problem is oil consumption, which can result from hardened valve seals or, in later ... More about Renault Laguna 2012 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.36 m | |
|
Renault Laguna is smaller, but higher. Renault Laguna is 19 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Laguna is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 423 litres | 364 litres | |
|
Renault Laguna has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Renault Laguna has 59 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Camaro. The Chevrolet Camaro may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`950 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 17 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Laguna has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |