Renault Laguna 2012 vs Toyota Celica 1999
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.8 Petrol | |
Diesel (Renault Laguna) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Toyota Celica) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 110 HP | 143 HP | |
Torque: | 240 NM | 172 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
Toyota Celica is a more dynamic driving. Renault Laguna engine produces 33 HP less power than Toyota Celica, but torque is 68 NM more than Toyota Celica. Due to the lower power, Renault Laguna reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 7.7 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
The Renault Laguna is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Laguna consumes 3.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica, which means that by driving the Renault Laguna over 15,000 km in a year you can save 525 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Laguna consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1570 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
1780 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
1130 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
Renault Laguna gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 8 years | 12 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota RAV4, Toyota Corolla Verso | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Renault Laguna 2012 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Laguna 2012 1.5 engine Toyota Celica 1999 1.8 engine: The 1ZZ-FE engine is more advanced, lighter, and simpler than its predecessor, emphasizing fuel efficiency and output. However, these improvements have come at the cost of reduced durability compared to earlier cast-iron engines. The engine block features an open-deck cooling design for easier production and lower ... More about Toyota Celica 1999 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.64 m | 4.34 m | |
Width: | 1.83 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.32 m | |
Renault Laguna is larger. Renault Laguna is 30 cm longer than the Toyota Celica, 9 cm wider, while the height of Renault Laguna is 8 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 423 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Laguna is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Celica, which means Renault Laguna can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`860 | 1`200 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 6000 | 2000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Laguna has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |