Renault Laguna 2012 vs Kia Cerato 2010
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 110 HP | 126 HP | |
Torque: | 240 NM | 157 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
Kia Cerato is a more dynamic driving. Renault Laguna engine produces 16 HP less power than Kia Cerato, but torque is 83 NM more than Kia Cerato. Due to the lower power, Renault Laguna reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 6.7 | |
The Renault Laguna is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Laguna consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Cerato, which means that by driving the Renault Laguna over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 52 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1570 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
1780 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
Renault Laguna gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 8 years | 19 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai i30, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Renault Laguna 2012 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Laguna 2012 1.5 engine Kia Cerato 2010 1.6 engine: Overall, the engine is reliable and not very demanding on fuel quality. Fuel injectors tend to be noisy. Timing chain resource is relatively low. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.64 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | 1.83 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.40 m | |
Renault Laguna is larger. Renault Laguna is 16 cm longer than the Kia Cerato, 7 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 423 litres | 440 litres | |
Despite its longer length, Renault Laguna has 17 litres less trunk space than the Kia Cerato. This could mean that the Renault Laguna uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Laguna is 0.6 metres more than that of the Kia Cerato, which means Renault Laguna can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`860 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 6600 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Laguna has
|
Kia Cerato has
| |