Renault Laguna 2012 vs Toyota Celica 1999
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.8 Petrol | |
Diesel (Renault Laguna) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Toyota Celica) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 143 HP | |
Torque: | 340 NM | 172 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
Renault Laguna engine produces 7 HP more power than Toyota Celica, whereas torque is 168 NM more than Toyota Celica. Despite the higher power, Renault Laguna reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 7.7 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
The Renault Laguna is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Laguna consumes 3.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica, which means that by driving the Renault Laguna over 15,000 km in a year you can save 480 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Laguna consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1460 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
1650 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
1010 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
Renault Laguna gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 14 years | 12 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota RAV4, Toyota Corolla Verso | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Laguna might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Renault Laguna engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Renault Laguna 2012 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. Toyota Celica 1999 1.8 engine: The 1ZZ-FE engine is more advanced, lighter, and simpler than its predecessor, emphasizing fuel efficiency and output. However, these improvements have come at the cost of reduced durability compared to earlier cast-iron engines. The engine block features an open-deck cooling design for easier production and lower ... More about Toyota Celica 1999 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.64 m | 4.34 m | |
Width: | 1.83 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.32 m | |
Renault Laguna is larger. Renault Laguna is 30 cm longer than the Toyota Celica, 9 cm wider, while the height of Renault Laguna is 8 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 423 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Laguna is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Celica, which means Renault Laguna can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`972 | 1`200 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 6000 | 2000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Laguna has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |