Renault Laguna 2012 vs Toyota Celica 1999

 
Renault Laguna
2012 -
Toyota Celica
1999 - 2002
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel1.8 Petrol
Diesel (Renault Laguna) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Toyota Celica) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences."
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 150 HP143 HP
Torque: 340 NM172 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.5 seconds8.7 seconds
Renault Laguna engine produces 7 HP more power than Toyota Celica, whereas torque is 168 NM more than Toyota Celica. Despite the higher power, Renault Laguna reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.57.7
Real fuel consumption: 6.5 l/100km7.9 l/100km
The Renault Laguna is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Renault Laguna consumes 3.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica, which means that by driving the Renault Laguna over 15,000 km in a year you can save 480 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Laguna consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica.
Fuel tank capacity: 66 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1460 km in combined cycle710 km in combined cycle
1650 km on highway880 km on highway
1010 km with real consumption690 km with real consumption
Renault Laguna gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Engine production duration: 14 years12 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Opel VivaroInstalled on at least 4 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota RAV4, Toyota Corolla Verso
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Laguna might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Renault Laguna engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.
Renault Laguna 2012 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication.

Toyota Celica 1999 1.8 engine: The 1ZZ-FE engine is more advanced, lighter, and simpler than its predecessor, emphasizing fuel efficiency and output. However, these improvements have come at the cost of reduced durability compared to earlier cast-iron engines. The engine block features an open-deck cooling design for easier production and lower ...  More about Toyota Celica 1999 1.8 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.64 m4.34 m
Width: 1.83 m1.74 m
Height: 1.40 m1.32 m
Renault Laguna is larger.
Renault Laguna is 30 cm longer than the Toyota Celica, 9 cm wider, while the height of Renault Laguna is 8 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 423 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Renault Laguna is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Celica, which means Renault Laguna can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9721`200
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): 60002000
Pros and Cons: Renault Laguna has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Toyota Celica has
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv