Renault Laguna 2001 vs Subaru Outback 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 123 HP | 209 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 282 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Subaru Outback is a more dynamic driving. Renault Laguna engine produces 86 HP less power than Subaru Outback, whereas torque is 112 NM less than Subaru Outback. Due to the lower power, Renault Laguna reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 10.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.5 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Laguna is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Laguna consumes 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback, which means that by driving the Renault Laguna over 15,000 km in a year you can save 420 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Laguna consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.58 m | |
| Renault Laguna is 2 cm shorter than the Subaru Outback, 1 cm wider, while the height of Renault Laguna is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 464 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Laguna has
|
Subaru Outback has
| |